Basic google translation from Italian:
This judgment No. 2010/148, part No. 2010/0474, journal.n ° 2012/886, gave the appeal lodged by parents against the Department of Health, who demanded the payment of compensation for irreversible complications caused by a vaccine.
Le vaccin en question est le ROR . The vaccine is MMR. Selon les parents, en fait, les symptômes de l’autisme de leur fils sont vraiment apparus à la suite de l’inoculation. According to parents, in fact, symptoms of autism in their son did appear after inoculation.
Et vraiment le jour même, comme lu dans le jugement . And really the same day, as read in the judgment . Au retour du dispensaire de Riccione, le 26 mars 2004, l’enfant a commencé à manifester des symptômes préoccupants (diarrhée et nervosité) puis entre 2004 et 2005 sont survenus des signes de grave détresse psycho-physique jusqu’à la reconnaissance, le 7 août 2007, de l’invalidité totale et permanente à 100%. Return to the clinic in Riccione, March 26, 2004, the child began to show troubling symptoms (diarrhea and nervousness) and then between 2004 and 2005 occurred signs of severe psychological distress to physical recognition, 7 August 2007, the total and permanent disability to 100%.
That it was told the vaccination, the specialist Niglio had already stated in June 2008 and the confirmation came a year later by the specialist Montanari. Le lien, selon le jugement est donc « établi ». Jusqu’à condamner le ministère de la Santé à payer une indemnité . The link, in the judgment is “established.” Up condemn the Ministry of Health to pay compensation.
Le jugement a provoqué une « grande confusion » entre les experts du Conseil Scientifique du Calendrier Vaccinal pour la Vie, qui rassemble des personnalités de hauts rangs de l’Hygiène et de la Santé Publique, de la Médecine Générale, de la Pédiatrie régionale-hospitalière et universitaire chapeautant la Société Italienne de l’Hygiène, de la Médecine Préventive et de la Santé Publique (SItI), la Fédération Italienne des Médecins de Médecine Générale (Fimmg), la Fédération Italienne des Médecins Pédiatres (Fimp) et la Société Italienne de Pédiatrie (Sip). The judgment has caused “great confusion” between the experts of the Scientific Council of the immunization schedule for Life, which brings together people with high ranks of Hygiene and Public Health, General Practice, the Regional Pediatric Hospital- university umbrella and the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health (ITIS), the Italian Federation of General Practice Doctors (Fimmg), the Italian Federation of Paediatricians Doctors (FIMP) and the Italian Society of Pediatrics (Sip)……….
Finally, to prevent this negative judgment set a precedent on professional dynamics, the Council hopes that the Ministry of Health, as an advocate in the case which led to the controversial judgment of first instance, will appeal to the Court of Bologna. A cette fin, les membres du Conseil se rendent « disponibles à aider le bureau du Procureur Général à fournir conseils et littératures scientifiques valables pour souligner en particulier l’incapacité de cette vaccination spécifique à créer des antécédents provocant l’autisme». To this end, Council members will make “available to assist the Attorney General’s office to provide advice and valid scientific literature to highlight in particular the failure of this specific vaccination to create provocative history of autism.”
VAN UK’s Comment: The blog reporting on this blamed the ruling on Andrew Wakefield’s ‘study’ – except that it wasn’t a study, it was a case series and it DIDN’T conclude MMR caused autism, only that further research should be done!
Further research has since been done around the world indicating a problem.
FULL COURT RULING SHOWING MMR CAUSES AUTISM (IN ITALIAN) HERE: http://www.comilva.org/Public/data/avvocato/2012321213954_SENTENZA-TRIB.%20LAV.RIMINI.Marzo%202012.pdf
Merck Caught Spiking Blood Samples with Animal Antibodies to Fraudulantly Claim Mumps Vaccine Efficacy
According to two whistle blowing former Merck virologists who filed a 2010 Federal False Claims Act complaint two years ago in 2010 when the Act first passed, as of June 28, 2012, the scientist’s complaint at last has been unsealed. The complaint reports allegedly that the corporate pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturer, Merck “knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, and sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks.”
The complaint allegedly accuses Merck of ripping off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was “95% effective, according to the June 28, 2012 Natural News article, “Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit,” by Mike Adams. Also check out yesterday’s June 27, 2012 Forbes article, “Merck Whistleblower Suit A Boon to Vaccine Foes Even As It Stresses Importance of Vaccines.”
There are two sides to the vaccine debate. Today you have breaking news focused on the sudden unsealing of a whistleblower suit against Merck, filed back in 2010 by two former employees accusing the drug maker of overstating the effectiveness of its mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine. What’s a fresh new angle on the news is that another company, Chatom Primary Care, also is suing Merck for monopolization of the vaccine industry at the same time as the whistleblowing scientists allegedly are accusing Merck of falsifying its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.
Source: The Examiner, 28th June 2012 – http://www.examiner.com/article/whistleblowing-virologists-sue-merck-for-alleged-falsification-of-mumps-data